Western Innovator: OMRI ensures organic material compliance
EUGENE, Ore. — The growing consumer appetite for organic food has caused a chain reaction through the agriculture industry, all the way through to farm input suppliers.
Rising interest in organic farming has spurred the creation of new products and companies seeking to supply those growers with organic fertilizers, pesticides and other goods.
Over the past 20 years, the number of products listed for organic use by the Organic Materials Review Institute has increased from fewer than 200 to more than 6,000.
OMRI, a nonprofit based in Eugene, Ore., is charged with ensuring those crop, livestock and processing products comply with organic standards established by the USDA.
In just the last year, the number of products listed by OMRI has shot up 20 percent.
There is some confusion about the institute’s role in the organic industry, said Peggy Miars, its executive director.
Companies occasionally try to convince OMRI to approve a product even though it contains a prohibited substance, not understanding the organization doesn’t make such calls, she said.
OMRI doesn’t decide whether it’s appropriate for a substance to be allowed in organic production — that responsibility falls to the USDA’s National Organic Program and an advisory group of industry stakeholders, the National Organic Standards Board.
“We never advocate for or against a particular substance,” said Miars.
Instead, the institute evaluates the formulations of branded products to determine if they’re composed of substances that are permitted by USDA.
When a substance is proposed for inclusion in organic production, the USDA may also hire the institute to research the material’s impacts on the environment and human health.
However, OMRI doesn’t make recommendations and stays out of controversies about approving or prohibiting substances, said Miars.
“One reason OMRI is respected is because we are neutral,” she said. “We don’t go one way or another.”
The vast majority of products listed by OMRI — 86 percent — pertain to growing crops, and most of those are fertilizers and soil amendments.
The remaining 14 percent are fairly evenly split between livestock products and processing products, such as those used to make cheese and wine.
In recent years, there have been a lot of new innovations with anaerobic digestate. This liquid and solid waste comes from anaerobic digesters, such as those that generate power from dairy manure, said Kelsey McKee, OMRI’s review program and quality director.
OMRI’s role is to ensure the digestate byproduct doesn’t contain substances that are prohibited in organic production, she said.
Input suppliers are also developing new products containing specific beneficial microbes and mycorrhizal fungi, McKee said.
These soil amendments go beyond general compost: Certain bacteria and fungi can reduce pressure from pathogens or maximize nutrient availability, she said.
OMRI determines whether these microorganisms are genetically engineered, which is excluded from organic farming, or are grown in synthetic media that aren’t allowed.
“Different microbes can have different roles,” McKee said. “We are looking at where are they getting it, how are they growing it.”
Before OMRI was founded two decades ago, organic certifiers such as Oregon Tilth and California Certified Organic Farmers would review branded products for compliance with organic standards.
As the work became increasingly time-consuming, these and other organic groups chipped in financially to launch OMRI, which would be dedicated to this function.
With the climbing number of products proposed for listing, the institute has been swamped with work.
When Miars was hired seven years ago, the organization received about 40 applications a month. It’s now up to 130.
Since the organization wasn’t willing to compromise on thoroughness, the backlog has lengthened OMRI’s review periods, Miars said. “We had a reputation for being really slow.”
A hiring spree that increased OMRI’s staff by 50 percent over the past two years has reduced the wait time. In late 2016, the median review process took seven months, but it’s now down to two months.
OMRI is also automating its application process to require less data-entry from employees, which the institute hopes will further improve efficiency.
“We are relying more and more on technology,” Miars said.
Cutting down on mind-numbing tasks serves another worthwhile function: Making jobs at OMRI more rewarding.
Recruiting and training educated workers costs money, so the nonprofit must focus on retaining them, she said. “It’s good to see people want to stay with OMRI and grow with us.”
To that end, the institute encourages its employees to give presentations and write articles about obscure materials-related dilemmas.
For example, can paper bags with colored ink be used in organic compost? The answer is yes — the ink is considered an unavoidable environmental contaminant.
The institute has also set its sights beyond the U.S.
In 2012, OMRI started a program to review materials that are compliant with Canada’s organic standards, and it’s looking to replicate the effort in Mexico.
Currently, organic materials review in Mexico is conducted by organic certifiers, Miars said. “There are certifiers and growers in Mexico who would love it if we could launch that program tomorrow.”
Organic Materials Review Institute
Executive director: Peggy Miars
Founded: 1997
Headquarters: Eugene, Ore.
Employees: 56
Function: Reviewing branded products for compliance with organic standards.
Listed products: More than 6,000
Product categories: More than 86 percent are crop-related, 7 percent are processing-related and nearly 7 percent are livestock-related.
Product origins: 70 percent are from the U.S., 13 percent are from Mexico, 7 percent are from Canada, and 10 percent are from 36 other countries.