Groups seek order to stop logging on former state forest land
Environmentalist groups want an injunction to stop logging on roughly 50 acres of private property that was once part of Oregon’s Elliott State Forest.
Three nonprofits — Cascadia Wildlands, Center for Biological Diversity and Audubon Society of Portland — have asked U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken to prohibit tree harvest on the parcel due to hazards to the threatened marbled murrelet.
Logging plans were previously abandoned in the area because Oregon realized it would cause Endangered Species Act violations, but a 355-acre parcel was bought in 2014 by Roseburg Forest Products Co. and its Scott Timber subsidiary for nearly $800,000, according to plaintiffs.
The environmentalists claim that harvesting a 50-acre site, known as the Benson Snake Unit, within that parcel will unlawfully destroy the habitat of marbled murrelets, which occupy old growth trees in the tract.
“The defendants are proposing to do exactly what the state thought it couldn’t,” said Dan Kruse, attorney for the environmentalists, during oral arguments on Nov. 22 in Eugene, Ore.
An injunction is warranted because the plaintiffs are likely to prevail in the lawsuit and logging would irreparably harm the species, he said.
In contrast, there’s nothing to show that the trees would be any less valuable if harvesting is delayed by a year or two, Kruse said.
Roseburg Forest Products counters that an internationally-recognized environmental consulting firm chose a site that’s not occupied by the threatened bird.
“They hired independent experts to determine where the birds might be in the stand and how they’re using the stand,” said Dominic Carollo, attorney for the timber company.
The company will also conduct logging during the autumn and winter, when marbled murrelets are out at sea, in an area that’s not considered critical habitat for the species, the defendants claim.
The case laid out by the plaintiffs doesn’t demonstrate that logging will cause actual “take” of marbled murrelets under ESA, Carollo said.
“At best they’ve proven it’s hypothetical or possible ... which isn’t sufficient,” he said. “They don’t have the facts or the evidence to show there will be death or injury to the marbled murrelet.
Kruse argued that “take” isn’t limited to destruction of nesting areas used by the species.
Under ESA, “take” also occurs when logging disrupts other behaviors necessary to the bird’s life cycle, such as courtship, he said.
Similarly, it can harm people if you bulldoze their living or kitchen while sparing the bed in which they sleep, he said.
Science has shown marbled murrelets need large blocks of habitat to survive, Kruse said.
“Fragmentation has significant impacts on marbled murrelets,” he said.