SACRAMENTO — Proponents say an updated plan to remove four dams from the Klamath River doesn’t skirt the U.S. Constitution or leave out opportunities for public debate.
In their first announced public meeting since announcing their plan last month, officials from Oregon, California and the federal government said it’s perfectly appropriate to seek dam removal approval through the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
“In my opinion, we’re not trying anything new here,” California Department of Fish and Wildlife director Charlton Bonham said during the March 16 hearing at the state Environmental Protection Agency headquarters. He added the FERC process for removing dams has existed since the 1920s.
Richard Whitman, natural resources adviser to Oregon’s Gov. Kate Brown, said no interstate compact is being made to set up the “non-federal” entity that would take control of the dams from owner PacifiCorp and handle their removal.
“It’s easy to get confused about this entity,” Whitman said. “That corporation is an independent corporation that is not an instrument of the states of Oregon or California.”
He also said the state is willing to help farming and ranching communities in Klamath County, where Commissioner Tom Mallams contends the dams’ removal would cost the county as much as $500,000 in annual revenue and take away local jobs.
Mallams, who attended the meeting, said he would like to see a settlement that resolves water issues in the Klamath Basin but wants the county “left whole.”
The exchanges came amid a sometimes contentious afternoon of haggling over language in the 133-page “agreement in principle” announced Feb. 2 by PacifiCorp, the states of Oregon and California and the U.S. Departments of the Interior and Commerce. The new agreement was reached after Congress failed to authorize the original Klamath Basin water-sharing agreements by the end of 2015.
The March 16 meeting was attended by representatives from most of the 42 original signatories to the 2010 agreements as well as critics, who in recent weeks have accused dam-removal proponents of meeting in secret and claimed the private entity created under the new plan would still need congressional approval.
The latter argument is based on a legal opinion issued in late January by Oregon Legislative Counsel Dexter Johnston, who opined the private entity amounted to an interstate compact that must be authorized by Congress under the Constitution. But Whitman said Johnston’s opinion was based on language from the original agreements and not the new pact, which the Oregon Department of Justice has assured him is legally sound.
“The amendments we’re discussing today are an agreement to a private party to handle removal of its dams,” he said.
The meeting began as a veritable rehashing of a more than decade-long debate over dam removal, as public officials given a chance to make opening statements argued in favor of or against the idea. Grace Bennett, chairwoman of the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors, argued removing the dams is unnecessary to help fish and would expose area residents to risks from the built-up sediment and loss of flood control and water supply.
“This is our livelihood, this is our watershed, this is our home,” Bennett said. “For two decades, the county government has worked with landowners and water users to improve fish habitat and water quality in a successful effort to reverse the last century’s trend of declining salmon runs.”
But Humboldt County Supervisor Mark Lovelace said his county supports dam removal “in this instance” because it will lead to benefits to downstream farms, recreation, the fishing fleet and other on-shore industries.
“Every boat is a small business — an independently owned, family-owned small business,” Lovelace said.
Proponents hope to craft a final version of their agreement and have all the original signatories on board with it by the end of this month, although Klamath Tribes chairman Don Gentry said the final pact would have to be put to tribal members for a vote.
The proponents are also beginning work on a separate pact that would continue the water-sharing arrangements and fisheries improvements in the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, they said.
PORTLAND — About 40 food vendors are taking part March 19 in a CSA Share Fair, at which customers will be able to hook up with Community Supported Agriculture operations that deliver in Portland neighborhoods.
Portland-area farmers, ranchers and fish suppliers will be on hand to discuss CSA options, which include deliveries of vegetables, fruit, meat, wild fish, honey, eggs, flowers and other items.
Other activities include demonstrations by local chefs, a cookbook exchange, food and drink stations and children’s activities. Admission is free.
Saturday is the second time the event has been held. It takes place from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. at The Redd, 831 S.E. Salmon St., Portland. The Redd,established by a non-profit, Ecotrust, serves as a food business “incubator.”
As befits a Portland event, the Share Fair has on-site bike parking and can be reached by bus, streetcar or car.
A CSA is essentially a food subscription service, in which customers pay a set fee for regular deliveries of food, primarily vegetables. They are popular in cities such as Portland where there is a receptive customer base for fresh, local food and support for small, urban farms.
The Share Fair coincides with release of the 2015 CSA Farming annual report, which showed CSAs continue to grow in scope nationally.
The report said the average CSA income increased to $35,443 in 2015 from $30,342 in 2014. Value per box increased to $47.21, compared $36.39 in 2014.
The 10most common items in CSA boxes nationally were lettuce, eggplant, garlic, carrots, Swiss chard, kale, green beans, broccoli, cabbage and cucumbers.
In a city serious about food, OSU innovation center is at home
By Eric Mortenson
Capital Press
PORTLAND — An agricultural experiment station might seem an unlikely resident of this city’s upscale Pearl District, which has gone from gritty warehouses and railyards to gain a self-described “worldwide reputation for urban renaissance.”
But Oregon State University’s Food Innovation Center has been perched along Naito Parkway since 2000. And in hindsight, the decision to open the FIC in what became arguably the foodie capital of the U.S. seems an inspired choice.
“Lucky, maybe,” laughs Thayne Dutson, who was dean of OSU’s College of Agricultural Sciences at the time.
Nonetheless, the FIC was OSU’s first foothold in Portland, where OSU and the University of Oregon increasingly scrap for attention, money and students. The FIC may have been the first agricultural experiment station — still its technical designation — to open in an urban area. It marked a major and continuing collaboration with the Oregon Department of Agriculture, which leases space in the FIC for its marketing, trade and laboratory services.
Staff at the FIC help Northwest food entrepreneurs with product development, manufacturing, safety, packaging, labeling, shelf-life and more. Its sensory science specialist can measure consumer acceptance of new products, and another researcher is working on the use of radio frequency identification technology (RFID) to track products as they move from processor to plate.
Clients range from hundreds of small entrepreneurs learning how to take their idea to market, to giant, unnamed food corporations that pay to test products with sophisticated Portland consumers.
The appointment of a new center director has people mulling the FIC’s role as producers and processors respond to consumers’ demand for better, safer and healthier food.
David Stone, an OSU toxicology professor and director and principal investigator of the National Pesticide Information Network on campus, takes over from retiring Director Michael Morrisey April 1.
Dan Arp, dean of OSU’s College of Agricultural Sciences, said Morrisey provided the FIC stability, direction and momentum during his nine years as director. Morrisey built a “terrific” staff, Arp said, and allowed them to develop to their full potential.
The FIC can raise its visibility as an integral part of the Portland scene, Arp said.
“Is it as well known as it should be? No, certainly not,” he said.
There’s no question the city is a “foodie hub,” Arp said, and the center can “accentuate that Portland vibe we all know and love.”
Stone said maintaining the center’s existing programs is important, but the FIC’s role will broaden as well. The center will hire a food safety professor this summer to educate people as the federal Food Safety Modernization Act unfolds.
Stone also wants to engage the “underserved” people who don’t have access to healthy food, and to provide more internships and other opportunities for students.
Staff members appear to share Arp’s and Stone’s vision.
“We now have a brand,” said Sarah Masoni, the FIC’s product development manager. “What we need to do next is figure out how to take it to next level.”
Research chef Jason Ball, who joined the staff 14 months ago, said the FIC is much like OSU’s other ag experiment stations in that it responds to needs of the micro-climate.
“And so to have us in the urban center of Portland makes sense from a food entrepreneur standpoint, and also from a sensory standpoint,” Ball said.
“One of the first things you notice is that people in Portland care so much about their food: Where it comes from, how it’s produced and what the ingredients are,” he said.
“The city is full of people who are really invested in food.”
It’s also full of people who make a living with food. An August 2015 study by Portland State University estimated the five-county Portland-area “food economy” employs 100,000 people. The study, “Portland’s Food Economy: Trends and Contributions,” counted jobs in food production, processing, distribution and services.
The authors said Portland alone had 40,000 food economy jobs, from grocery store and processing plant employees to restaurant workers. Food economy jobs accounted for slightly more than 10 percent of all employment in the city and grew by 6.9 percent from 2010 to 2012 alone, according to the study. The growth rate nearly doubled that of non-food jobs.
Establishing the FIC in Portland came before anyone knew that would happen.
Dutson, who retired from OSU in 2008, said the idea came first from Roy Arnold, then the ag school dean.
Arnold hosted a meeting at his house with Dutson, who was experiment station director and the college’s associate director of research, and with Bob Buchanan, then ODA director, and his top assistant, Bruce Andrews.
Arnold believed OSU and the state agency should ramp up their connections. The four men shared a collaborative view of what could be accomplished by establishing a “hotbed of different disciplines.”
It made sense to combine food science and market development activities in the state’s largest city, Dutson said. “It all really fits together.”
Dutson and Andrews eventually succeeded their bosses at their respective institutions, and carried the vision into office with them. They rounded up political support, particularly from then-Sen. Mark Hatfield, and financial help from the USDA and other sources.
The center wobbled a bit in early years, but OSU and the ag department would not let it “die on the vine,” Dutson said. Hiring Morrisey as station director in 2007 — he’d been manager of OSU’s seafood lab in Astoria — was a “very good move,” Dutson said.
Arp, the current OSU dean, has described food as “the handshake between urban and rural.”
“Our name is the College of Agricultural Sciences, but our mission really is food, ag science and natural resources,” Arp said.
“That allows us to take a soil-to-shelf approach to everything we do. That requires places like the FIC to be the point of the spear in doing that.”
Federal regulators are again delving into the process of dividing up roughly 1.6 million acre-feet of water stored behind 13 dams in Oregon’s Willamette Valley.
Those dams perform flood control during the rainy winter months but also hold water during the spring and summer that’s designated for joint use by irrigators, municipalities, industries, recreationists and fish.
Exactly how much water is allocated for each use is currently undefined, but the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — which operates the dams — is under an internal deadline to ration it out by mid-2017.
The agency recently restarted the earliest “scoping” phase of the allocation process, which involves collecting information from the public on water needs.
Future irrigation demands calculated by the Oregon Water Resources Department and Oregon Department of Agriculture will be considered by the Corps.
The process of allocating the water was previously undertaken in the 1990s but was postponed by a “biological opinion” that analyzed the impact of dams on several fish protected under the Endangered Species Act, said Mary Anne Nash, public policy counsel for the Oregon Farm Bureau.
“It halted the process while they did that work,” she said.
Under a biological opinion completed in 2008, the amount of water slated for irrigation is capped at 95,000 acre feet, but the Oregon Farm Bureau and other irrigator groups hope to increase agriculture’s share under the Army Corps’ allocation process.
Currently, irrigators in the Willamette Valley have contracted with the federal government to use 74,000 acre-feet of the water available.
It’s too early to tell how much water will realistically be devoted to irrigation under the allocation plan, which is expected to be submitted for approval by Congress in 2018, said Nash.
Apart from the water supply, growers must have the facilities to convey it to their crops, she said. “That’s been a missing piece for quite a while.”
Due to the expense involved, such infrastructure has largely been built near the river systems on which the dams are located, Nash said. The longer-term goal is to irrigate farmland that’s further away from those sources.
Drought conditions like those in 2015 may increase irrigation demands in future years. More farmers in the region are also growing higher-value crops, such as blueberries, that require summer irrigation.
Greg Bennett, an onion farmer near Salem, Ore., said the Willamette Valley may have an opportunity to increase vegetable production as California farmers continue to face water scarcity.
“I’m really hoping we can realize the value of what we have,” he said.
While the 13 dams have the capacity to store 1.6 million acre-feet, that represents ideal water conditions, said Kathryn Warner, an environmental scientist at the Corps.
Realistically, the dams hold about 1.4 million acre feet of water during an adequate year, and 500,000 acre-feet are dedicated to in-stream uses for fish under the current biological opinion.
The amount designated to irrigation could rise above 95,000 acre feet, but the entire allocation plan must be reviewed under the National Environmental Policy Act, Warner said.
This process will include inter-agency consultation on species impacts and may require another biological opinion, Warner said.
MARSING, Idaho (AP) — Small, green blades of grass are sprouting next to bundles of buttercup flowers in some areas of Owyhee County, near Jordan Valley. A contrasting scene to what the hills looked like directly after the Soda Fire last summer, black and scorched.
Ed Wilsey, owner of Wilsey Ranch outside Marsing, said that over the past few months he’s watched the Bureau of Land Management seed the land through aerial tactics and drill seeding.
“I have to give them credit because they seeded fast,” Wilsey said. “Now we just have to hope Mother Nature brings us enough rain.”
While most of the grass seen growing near Wilsey’s ranch was established grass that survived the fire, a mix of rain and sun could help the diverse grass seed the BLM placed sprout within the next month.
The BLM created an extensive rehabilitation plan to help growth of sage brush and grass in Owyhee County, but months after the fire, ranchers are skeptical about the BLM’s chance of success.
During a meeting between Idaho and Oregon BLM officials and local ranchers affected by the fire, the BLM asked ranchers, who used the burned public land to graze cattle, to sign agreements saying they will stay off the land for at least two years. If ranchers did not sign the contracts, the BLM said it could suspend ranchers’ grazing rights.
“We need to get cows out there,” Wilsey said. “Cows will help get the seed in the ground. Just by walking, they dig and create a better land.”
Resting land for two years after a natural disaster is basic protocol. The Soda Fire ended more than six months ago, and many local ranchers are paying high costs per day to keep their cattle off the ground.
According to BLM documents, on Oct. 16 the BLM made the decision to implement emergency stabilization and rehabilitation projects and land treatments “necessary to reduce the immediate risk of erosion or damage due to the Soda Fire.”
The plan, which can be found on the BLM’s website, states the land in Owyhee County must be stabilized immediately. An Emergency Stabilization and Rehabilitation team of more than 40 natural resource specialists assessed damage and threats to life, property and resources on BLM managed lands in Idaho and Oregon.
In the plan, the BLM recognized four significant threats to the land: expansion of invasive plant species; habitat recovery for threatened species; increased runoff, erosion potential and resulting flooding; and loss of cultural resources.
The BLM plan is to plant desirable grasses and shrubs in the area.
“This will not only combat invasive weeds, it will assist the area in recovering back to sagebrush steppe,” the plan stated. “Which will in turn attract native wildlife, such as greater sage-grouse, deer, elk and hundreds of other sagebrush steppe species.”
The BLM also stated in the plan that fire lines, fuel breaks and other fire preventative methods will be sought to help keep the burned acres safe while sage brush is re-established. According to the BLM, it takes decades for sage brush and its coexisting wildlife to re-establish.
“We plan to implement fuel breaks as we work on rehabilitation plans,” the BLM wrote, “so we can improve the odds that this area will make a full recovery.”
According to the plan, almost 180,000 acres of BLM land burned in Idaho during the Soda Fire. Another 100,000 acres of privately owned land was burned as well.
In fiscal year 2015, the BLM plans to spend $10.8 million on the emergency stabilization portion of the rehabilitation. In 2016, the BLM estimates spending $18.9 million on emergency stabilization.
In the written agreement presented to ranchers during the meeting on Feb. 18, ranchers would have to stay off specific parts of the BLM land for at least two years or until certain objectives are met. BLM officials said in the meeting that ranchers would not have access to land after two years if plan objectives were not met, but they seemed positive that would not be an issue.
The objectives are broken into four sections: drill seeding, aerial grass seeding, natural recovery and other treatments.
Tony Richards, a rancher near Reynolds Creek, spoke up during the meeting saying he was concerned about the objectives.
“We could be off anywhere from six to eight years on parts of our allotment,” Richards said.
Richards and others at the meeting, including Owyhee County Commissioner Kelly Aberasturi, said land owners should not sign the agreement until it states only a two-year figure.
During the meeting, Peter Torma, a BLM range land management specialist, said the objectives are not meant to be unattainable.
“We’re not trying to get cows back in a hurry, but we are not trying to preclude them,” Torma said. “We’re trying to identify a path that we feel is actually going to keep us moving in the right direction.”
According to the agreement, the earliest that ranchers could start grazing on public land would be in the year 2018. Many land allotments will be closed until 2019 because the BLM will perform drill seeding in the fall of 2016.
Other BLM officials during the meeting asked ranchers and farmers to look at the “bigger picture” when it comes to the health of the land, stating the plan could create a long-lasting future and protection from other natural disasters.
At Wilsey’s ranch, it’s hard to tell where the fire burned. New grass is growing on the hills, both seeded and grass that survived the disaster. He said the BLM provided him with enough seed to start growth on his private land, and they aerial-seeded the land around him.
Overall, the success of the grass is a mix of good luck and diligent effort.
“We were lucky we had a wet season,” Wilsey said. “They really did work hard out there, but now we have to hope the seeds germinate. But I have a lot of faith in what they did this fall.”
If Wilsey and other ranchers agree to stay off the land for two years or more while BLM objectives are met, it could cost the ranchers millions.
February and March is calving season for cattle ranchers, and Wilsey already has 60 new head of cattle walking around on his land. Many of Wilsey’s neighbors are feeding hay to their cattle, which is a much higher cost than grazing. Wilsey and others have taken some of their herds and moved them to other ranches to feed.
Wilsey said the cows are used to walking and grazing. Because of this, the animals he chose to keep on site are eating less hay, hoping to start eating the new grass on the other side of the electric fence. Lines of hay sit untouched by hundreds of cows and the new calves.
To keep a cow on another ranch costs $2.50 per day, and Wilsey has 180 cows. To keep a yearling on the ranch costs $1.80 per day, and the Wilsey ranch has sent 150 yearlings. So it is costing Wilsey $720 per day to keep his cows on another ranch to graze.
“The best method is to let the cows graze,” Wilsey said.
The beef from the Wilsey ranch is sold at the Boise Farmers’ Market, the Boise Co-op and many other local markets in the Treasure Valley. He said raising the price of his beef would not help cover costs because his competitors would beat him with lower prices.
It’s the high costs to ranchers like Wilsey that have Owyhee County commissioners concerned. During the meeting on Feb. 18, Commissioner Jerry Hoagland commented that the loss of revenue to ranchers will hurt his county’s economy.
“That’s affecting us beside you,” he said. “Now you’ve got to increase more money to go out and find pasture somewhere else. You can’t survive in that, which means a loss to us.”
Wilsey said he and his wife, Debbie, are playing the waiting game in hopes the seeds germinate and BLM will open its land up soon.
The first step of reviewing and perhaps revising the state’s contentious wolf management plan begins March 18 in Salem when the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Commission meets with selected panelists.
The review comes as Oregon’s wolf population continues to grow and stake out new territory, a development cheered by activists and frowned at by livestock producers. An annual survey by ODFW biologists showed the state had a minimum of 110 wolves at the end of 2015, up from 81 at the end of 2014. In 2009, the state counted only 14 wolves.
An ODFW wolf report said 33 pups born in 2015 survived through the end of the year.
The ODFW Commission voted 4-2 in November 2015 to remove wolves from the state endangered species list. Environmental groups challenged the decision, arguing among other things that ODFW should have completed the plan review before de-listing wolves. The Oregon Legislature and Gov. Kate Brown approved a bill that ratified the decision and nullified the legal challenge, however.
The plan review may take nine months. Friday’s commission meeting will include input from organizations that have been involved in wolf issues the past 10 years, including Cascadia Wildlands, Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Oregon Wild, Oregon Cattleman’s Association, Oregon Farm Bureau, Oregon Hunters Association and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.
Although no longer covered under the state Endangered Species Act, wolves ranging west of Highways 395, 78 and 95 – the western two-thirds of the state – remain protected under the federal ESA. ODFW officials say the state wolf management plan remains in effect and believe it will protect wolves from illegal hunting.
The commission meeting at 8 a.m. Friday at ODFW headquarters, 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive S.E., Salem.
ANDERSON, Calif. — Private landowners in Northern California and parts of the Northwest are scrambling to adopt conservation plans for the fisher, which may soon be added to the federal list of protected species.
In Northern California, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is taking public comments through April 1 on Sierra Pacific Industries’ proposed 10-year enhancement-of-survival permit, which would allow incidental take of fishers in exchange for improving their habitat on its timberlands.
Measures the timber company would undertake on about 1.5 million acres in 16 counties would include limiting logging activities during critical denning periods, taking steps to keep out trespassers growing marijuana and making sure fishers can’t get into water tanks at logging sites and drown, according to USFWS.
The permit “would allow us to continue managing as we would have absent the listing because we are improving habitat conditions for the fisher,” Sierra Pacific spokesman Mark Pawlicki told the Capital Press in an email.
The proposed Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances “provides benefits to the fisher that exceed any protections that would occur from a listing,” he said.
The USFWS is expected to decide April 7 whether to list the West Coast population of fishers as threatened in Washington, Oregon and California.
A mammal about the size of a house cat, the fisher is a member of the weasel family
Sierra Pacific’s application is one of two proposed CCAAs for which the federal government is taking comments. The other is from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, which wants to sign up forest landowners to voluntarily protect fishers to avoid facing tougher land-use limits.
About 60 to 75 landowners have expressed interest in Washington state’s agreement, WDFW wildlife biologist Gary Bell has estimated. The public comment period for that agreement ends March 30.
A similar plan organized by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife is under review at the Department of the Interior headquarters in Washington, D.C., and should be out for public comment soon, said Jody Caicco, a USFWS forest resources division manager in Portland.
About eight timber companies have voiced interest in Oregon’s plan, Caicco said. As long as the plan is published before April 7 and the comment period is underway, landowners can sign up within 30 days of a listing, before it is recorded in the Federal Register, she said.
“It’s actually going to be down to the wire, for sure,” Caicco said. “But … all it is is a matter of submitting their application.”
There would be differences between the agreements, officials said. While Washington’s plan would be administered by the state, USFWS would handle applications from individual landowners in Oregon under a single agreement, Caicco said.
In addition, while Washington’s plan protects known fisher sites, California’s is geared toward generally preserving habitat. That’s because animals in Washington are collared, enabling officials to know where they are, while in California they are not collared, said Robert Carey, a USFWS wildlife biologist in Yreka, Calif.
Neither Carey nor Caicco are aware of other landowners preparing CCAA applications on their own, and they doubt there would be enough time. Despite all the scrambling to meet the deadlines, there is no chance a listing decision would be delayed, Carey said.
“The decision was already extended once,” he said. “Originally the decision was due out in October 2015 and they extended it out to April of 2016. … I don’t think they can (extend it again).”
Once a listing is published in the Federal Register, a landowner would not be able to obtain a candidate conservation agreement, Carey said. He or she could submit a Habitat Conservation Plan and apply for an incidental take permit, but they would not give a landowner quite as much latitude, Carey said.
Some landowner groups hope their voluntary conservation efforts will avert a listing of the fisher, as voluntary protection measures were a major factor in the USFWS decision not to list the greater sage grouse. The Washington Forest Protection Association and Washington Farm Forestry Association are among groups supporting the state’s approach.
For Sierra Pacific Industries, the CCAA is seen as a sort of insurance as the company anticipates taking fishers as a result of periodically harvesting and moving timber within the animal’s habitat.
Even if the fisher is not listed, “we will still incorporate the measures in the CCAA in our forest management to assure that the fisher is protected during our normal operations,” Pawlicki said.
ELLENSBURG, Wash. — Mary Lou Masterson Burke, a cattle rancher well known for her expertise in water and private property rights, died March 13 in John Day, Ore. She was 80.
Burke was born July 3, 1935, in Ellensburg, and grew up on the historic Masterson Ranch, homesteaded by her great-grandfather in 1880, in the Teanaway Valley.
She married Pat Burke in 1956 and they ranched and raised their family together in the Teanaway until moving to Fox, Ore., near John Day, in 2006. The family operates ranches near Fox and Ellensburg.
Mary Burke was the first woman president of the Washington State Cattlemen’s Association and was past president of Kittitas County Cattlewomen and Kittitas County Cattlemen. She served on committees of the National Cattlemen’s Association.
“She’s been friends of my grandparents longer than I’ve been alive. She was always an inspiration to me, encouraged me to become an attorney and mentored me,” said Toni Meacham, a Connell attorney active in agricultural issues.
“She would say, ‘Go forth and do good.’ She always told me that,” Meacham said.
Marriage interrupted Burke’s college career but she became self taught in water and private property issues and law and became a knowledgeable resource to legislators and attorneys in the 1980s and 1990s, Meacham said.
She testified before Congress multiple times on agricultural issues and people across the nation consulted her, she said.
Her interest in law was nurtured when she went to work in a law office in the 1970s when cattle prices were low. She had a quick grasp of issues and written material.
“She read the whole ESA (Endangered Species Act) and could digest it, remember it and see the impacts,” Meacham said.
She had a distinctive voice, a way with words and “could insult people and they wouldn’t even know they’d been insulted,” Meacham said. “She didn’t speak frivolously. She always had a point and would get to it even when you thought she was rambling.”
Burke is survived by her husband, Pat, of Fox, and sons Joe, of Fox, and James, of Ellensburg, and other family members.
A funeral service was set for 11 a.m. March 18 at the Ellensburg Presbyterian Church. Memorial contributions may be made to the Presbyterian Church of Mt. Vernon, Ore., or the Washington Cattlemen’s Association Endowment Trust Fund. Arrangements are by Brookside Funeral Home.
PORTLAND — Heavy rain and mountain snow that socked Western Oregon March 10-14 restored the low- and middle-elevation snowpack that had been lost during an earlier warm stretch, but continued weather fluctuations make summer water predictions a guessing game, according to the USDA’s National Resources Conservation Service.
Scott Oviatt, NRCS snow survey supervisor in Portland, said it’s becoming more likely the region will have sufficient water this summer, but an extended warm spell and early snowpack melt could change the outlook.
Irrigation districts and reservoir operators might want to hedge their bets, he said. “If you have the ability to store a little more (water) now, that’s great,” he said.
Oregon river basins are “right at the cusp” in terms of having sufficient water, Oviatt said. In most of them, the amount of water contained in the snowpack — called the “snow-water equivalent “ — is near normal or above normal for this time of year.
Notable exceptions are the Willamette River basin, which is at 83 percent of normal, the Hood-Sandy-Lower Deschutes areas, which are at 84 percent of normal, and the Owyhee Basin, which sits at 82 percent. The comparisons are based on averages compiled from 1981 to 2010.
The snowpack levels are somewhat mixed, but heavy rain this winter has put precipitation totals off the charts. Every Oregon river basin measured by NRCS has recorded precipitation more than 100 percent of normal.
“That doesn’t mean the drought’s over,” Oviatt said. Many reservoirs were low, and refilling them with rain or melting snow takes time.
“It’s a building process,” Oviatt said. “This is a step in the right direction.”
A bill that averts an environmentalist lawsuit by ratifying the removal of wolves from Oregon’s list of endangered species has been signed by Gov. Kate Brown.
Oregon wildlife regulators found that wolf populations have recovered enough to delist the species last year, which prompted three environmental groups — Cascadia Wildlands, Oregon Wild and the Center for Biological Diversity — to petition the Oregon Court of Appeals to overturn the decision.
House Bill 4040, which holds that the delisting process complied with the law, was approved by Oregon lawmakers during the 2016 legislative session and effectively voided the environmentalists’ argument that the decision was illegal.
Brown signed HB 4040 on March 15 over the objections of environmentalists, who urged her to veto the bill, arguing the legislature shouldn’t have interfered with a judicial review of the wolf delisting that they had sought.
SALEM — A ballot initiative to end daylight-saving time in Oregon is on hold until 2017.
Medford resident David Miles launched a petition drive in November to abolish the tradition by 2018.
Miles said his force of about 20 volunteers was insufficient to gather the required 117,578 signatures to place the measure on the ballot in November. As of Sunday, the group had collected about 1,000 signatures, Miles said.
“We have our sights set on next year,” Miles said.
“I had to look at it realistically, as much as I would have loved to have it on the ballot this year,” he added.
Miles said he plans to start a Go Fund Me page to raise money to hire paid petitioners next year.
The community service officer with Jackson County Sheriff’s Office said he started the initiative after feeling tired of complaining every year about losing sleep and adjusting clocks and deciding he should do something about it.
Adjusting the clock forward in the spring may cause spikes in workplace accidents and traffic crashes, according to multiple bodies of research, including one by the University of Colorado.
A University of California Berkeley study found that a two-month extension of daylight-saving time in Australia during the Sydney Olympic Games in 2000 failed to curtail electricity demand.
Lawmakers in several states, including California, have proposed alternatives to daylight saving changes or asked that voters decide on whether to keep the practice.
“What I would really like to see the country say is enough is enough and end daylight saving nationally,” Miles said.
He said if more states opt to abolish the practice, there may be more momentum for a national change.
Oregon Sen. Kim Thatcher, R-Keizer, introduced a bill in January 2015 that would have let voters to decide whether to abolish daylight saving in 2021.
Dozens of Oregonians testified in favor of the measure.
The legislation stalled in the Senate Rules Committee because some lawmakers were concerned about being out of sync with Washington and California, according to Thatcher’s office.
The country had an on-and-off-again relationship with daylight-saving time until 1966 when Congress codified it to try to simplify a confusing patchwork of different time zones across the country. Individual states were allowed to opt out. Arizona, Hawaii and some U.S. territories have chosen to remain on standard time.
The No More Daylight Saving Time in Oregon initiative was the first that Miles sponsored.
“I’m not upset it didn’t get on the ballot,” he said. “I learned a lot. I understand that some of my goals were unrealistic. It’ll give me more of an ability to be successful next time.”
In the meantime, he maintains a Facebook page where he’ll give supporters updates on the effort.
https://www.facebook.com/nomoredstinoregon/
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Ammon Bundy has come to the defense of a sheriff who is under investigation for his actions during the occupation of a national wildlife refuge in southeast Oregon.
The state agency that licenses police officers has asked the state Justice Department to look into complaints that Grant County Sheriff Glenn Palmer met with some of the occupiers during the 41-day standoff.
Bundy, the now-jailed leader of the occupation, said in a recording posted on the Bundy Ranch Facebook page that Palmer didn’t get caught in the “political deception” that the people of Burns were in danger during the protest. He says Palmer went to the source and learned that the protesters “would not hurt another person.”
If Palmer is found to have violated standards, he could lose his police certification.
BAKER CITY, Ore. (AP) — Seven months after Baker County fought its largest wildfire ever, a helicopter has returned to the region -- this time with wood instead of water.
The Baker City Herald reports that the chopper is dropping hundreds of tons of wood mulch on land burned by the Cornet-Windy Ridge fire. The Forest Service hired Mountain West Helicopters of Provo, Utah, for the work.
The mulch is expected to stabilize steep slopes that were stripped of vegetation by the fire.
Ray Lovisone of Wallowa-Whitman National Forest is overseeing the work. He says it will reduce the risk of mudslides in Stices Gulch and along Highway 245.
Lovisone says the work focuses on about 88 acres where the combination of steep ground and high-intensity fire has caused a high risk of slides.
